Verification

Fake news photo checker

Breaking news brings a flood of images, and some are generated, edited or recycled from another event. Check the file here, then trace it back the way professional fact-checkers do.

Free · no sign-up · your file never leaves your device

Drop the news photo, click to choose, or paste

JPEG · PNG · WebP · AVIF · HEIC (Safari) — checked on your device

Three ways a news photo is fake

Professional fact-checkers sort misleading images into roughly three groups, and each needs a different check.

Generated

An image model created the whole scene: an explosion near a landmark, a politician being arrested, a flooded city. These spread fastest when they confirm what people already fear. The detector on this page is built for them: it reads generator credentials and runs a neural classifier that recognises the statistics of generated pixels.

Manipulated

A genuine photo with something added, removed or changed — a weapon placed in a hand, a sign rewritten, a crowd enlarged. Modern manipulation is often done with AI editing tools. If the editor recorded it, GPTTrace reports an “edited with generative AI” credential. If not, crop to the suspicious region and check it separately.

Mis-captioned

The most common kind: a real, unedited photo presented with the wrong time, place or story. No detector can catch this, because nothing about the pixels is false. Reverse image search, geolocation and contacting the source are the only defences.

Reading a detector result during a breaking story

Images circulating on social platforms have usually been re-encoded several times, stripping metadata and blurring fine detail. Expect fewer “proof” results and more probabilities. A high classifier score on a dramatic image with no traceable source is a strong reason not to share it. A low score does not make an image trustworthy — it may simply be a real photo from somewhere else.

Look at the list of reasons. Camera metadata that names a phone and a capture time from the day of the event supports authenticity; a generator-standard size such as 1024×1024 with no camera data points the other way. When the result is inconclusive, the steps above will settle it more reliably than another tool.

Journalists: GPTTrace runs entirely in your browser, so you can check images from confidential sources without uploading them to a third party. Include the report text (“Copy report”) in your verification notes.

Tools fact-checkers use

Beyond this detector: reverse image search engines for the earliest copy, satellite and street-level imagery for geolocation, sun-position calculators for checking shadows against the claimed time, and archive services for finding deleted original posts.

How accurate is it? Our measured numbers

We test GPTTrace on labelled image samples and publish the results, including where it does badly. It is tuned to keep false accusations rare, so it misses some AI content rather than flag real work.

image check: AUC 0.938 (cross-validated)

679 labelled samples (399 AI, 280 human), run 2026-10-08. At the “Likely AI” line it caught 64% of AI samples and wrongly flagged 5% of human ones.

SourceTruthSamplesResult at “Likely AI”
gemini-nano-bananaAI4040% caught
midjourney-v6AI4068% caught
midjourney-v5AI4073% caught
flux-devAI4013% caught
flux-schnellAI4048% caught
sdxlAI40100% caught
gpt-imageAI4030% caught
klingAI3997% caught
leonardo-stablecogAI4098% caught
bitmind-imagine-mixAI4080% caught
fullsize-photosHuman4010% wrongly flagged
open-images-photosHuman405% wrongly flagged
lfw-facesHuman400% wrongly flagged
caltech-objectsHuman403% wrongly flagged
coco-photosHuman400% wrongly flagged
ffhq-facesHuman400% wrongly flagged
celeba-facesHuman4018% wrongly flagged

Data sources and method: methodology & accuracy.

How fact-checkers verify a news photo

  1. Save the highest-quality copy and run it through the detector. Note whether it carries Content Credentials from a camera or news agency.
  2. Reverse-search it with two engines. Look for the earliest date and the original uploader.
  3. Geolocate: match buildings, signs, terrain and road markings against map and street-level imagery.
  4. Chronolocate: check shadows, weather and daylight against the claimed time; compare with other footage of the same event.
  5. Contact the source and ask for the original file and how it was taken.

Frequently asked questions

Are most fake news photos AI-generated?
No — most are real photos with a false caption: an old disaster presented as a new one, a photo from another country, or a crowd shot from a different event. AI images are a growing share, especially for dramatic scenes, but always check the context as well as the pixels.
Do news agencies use Content Credentials?
Increasingly. Several agencies and broadcasters sign their images with C2PA credentials through participating cameras and newsroom software. A valid credential from a known agency is strong evidence of origin, and GPTTrace shows who signed it.
The image was posted by a verified account. Is it safe to share?
Verification badges confirm identity or payment, not accuracy. Well-known accounts have shared AI images during almost every major news event.
What if I can’t decide?
Don’t share it, or share it with a clear note that it is unverified. Waiting an hour often settles the question as reporters on the ground publish confirmed material.